They’re great for brainstorming, sketching up ideas, keeping track of deliverables in projects, and they’re wonderfully, (though sometimes too easily and other times impossibly) erasable.
Now you can turn any surface (usually a wall) into a dry-erase whiteboard with Idea Paint (Thanks to the W5 Blog!).
While I may paint a wall in the office, this has gotten me thinking beyond usage on walls…there’s some cool potential here.
1. Symmetry – It allows us to fill in gaps, to find and experience order, it provides a type of comfort as we naturally seek and prefer it.
2. Subtraction – Less is more.
3. Seduction – An alluring power to attract attention and mobilize the imagination.
4. Sustainability – A system or solution in which symmetry, seduction and subtraction are applied repeatably with success. It also means that the solution itself has staying power.
In general I like these definitions, so I began to look for an example of an elegant something that has these four traits, and I found it.
Yes, you read correctly. Soap Operas are elegant in their implementation and now, I see them as a thing of beauty.
So, why are soap operas elegant and what can we learn from them? Let’s look at the attributes.
Symmetry – Since humans naturally look for, and prefer symmetry, in soap operas we have a tendency to look for balance (this also works hand-in-hand with seduction as we’ll see in a moment). The writers of soap operas are brilliant in balancing justice/injustice, good/evil, what should be/what is, youth/elderly, life/death, what we don’t experience in life/what we do experience.
Subtraction - Soaps are masterful at using less to achieve more. Dialogues are short and to the point. During the course of a show, the overwhelming majority of scenes last less than minute before moving to a new scene. Interestingly, the majority of scenes contain two people and when a third appears often one of the other characters leaves. It’s also not unusual for characters to get killed off or eliminated in some way from certain chunks of a show or season. It’s also not unusual for one actor to play multiple parts.
Seduction – Not even counting the obvious seduction from the sexual side, the tantalizing views of symmetry glimpsed through moments of asymmetry seduce our imaginations and make us speculate about how something will be resolved. Scenes cut out at just the right time so that we need to keep watching to find the resolution- we crave and want the symmetrical solution- we want justice for the characters- we want to be right in our predictions of where the show will take us.
Sustainability – The success of soap operas is staggering; in fact, if the soap opera isn’t an example of sustainability, I’m not sure what is.
Okay, so soaps are elegant, what does that mean?
It means that elegant innovations/solutions don’t need more procedures or more features; they simply need to capture the imagination, and appeal to human nature’s sense of symmetry, simplicity and beauty.
Before any of this can be accomplished, however, we need to observe the world within and without. It is in observation that the seeds of elegant solutions are born.
Thomas Friedman, inspired by a conference he recently attended, waxes about ways of getting out of the current economic crisis. He paints an interesting picture of Russia as a one-trick pony, economically speaking – in essence, oil is Russia’s only business and when oil prices are low, they’re in trouble.
He ends with this great quote:
Lately, there has been way too much talk about minting dollars and too little about minting our next Thomas Edison, Bob Noyce, Steve Jobs, Bill Gates, Vint Cerf, Jerry Yang, Marc Andreessen, Sergey Brin, Bill Joy and Larry Page. Adding to that list is the only stimulus that matters. Otherwise, we’re just Russia with a printing press.
Humans are inherently creative-they want to create and express themselves in some way. One of the best countries (if not the best) for people to express their creativity and make a living from it is the United States of America.
Seems to me that with the right environment, an environment empowering people instead of rewarding colossal failure, recovery would be on the way.
Please check out this excellent article over at Business Week about Office Max’s innovation efforts.
There are some great insights into how they chose to redefine how and what they sell. Some great guidelines for innovating as well:
• Focus on Unspoken Needs
Needs represent market opportunities, but consumers are unlikely to come out and say, for instance, “I want a better way to label file folders.” Researchers read between the lines to uncover real needs.
• Study customers in their environment
You’ll learn far more observing people’s everyday behaviors than you ever would by asking them questions in a focus group.
• Watch for Contradictions
When someone says one thing and does another, that’s often the sign of an opportunity.
• Identify Your Target Customer
In-depth ethnographic studies usually involve no more than a dozen subjects, so make sure they are the right ones. Depending on the project, it might be important to include subjects from different regions or countries, or to get a mix of urban and rural participants. A food company, for instance, needs to understand regional differences in eating habits, while a pet food maker might want to study the differing needs of city dwellers and out-of-towners.
• Use Multiple Tools to Record Material
In addition to written notes, the researchers used video, which allowed them to capture rich detail. Audio is useful when researchers want to be less obtrusive. An advantage of still photographs is that they are easy to sort later as researchers review materials looking for common problems and other valuable insights.
Cows Supping at the Flannery Farm (Michael Plishka, 2009)
“What has been will be again,
what has been done will be done again;
there is nothing new under the sun.”
-Ecclesiastes 1:9
According to a recent press release from Stonyfield Farm , they’ve pioneered a way of reducing greenhouse gas emissions from dairy cattle while improving the nutritional value of the milk.
By removing things like corn and soy from the cows’ diet and replacing it with a mixture of grasses, alfalfa, and flax, the cows burp substantially less methane and create better quality milk. According to Stonyfield:
“(We have) been able to reduce the enteric emissions from the cows by as much as 18%, an average of 12%. If every US dairy were to adopt this approach, in less than one year , the amount of greenhouse gas emissions we could reduce would be the equivalent of taking more than half a million cars off the road!”-Nancy Hirshberg, Stonyfield V.P. of Natural Resources and the director of the Stonyfield Greener Cow Project
This is an amazing feat and hats off to Stonyfield for taking the lead in doing this.
There’s only one problem…
It’s not really new or innovative.
Small family farms (like the Flannery Farm pictured above) have been feeding their cows diets without corn, soy and other non-cowlike additives, for years! It’s only in the world of mega-farming that corn and soy (and wonderful things like rendered fat, fish and blood) and have found their way into the guts of cows whose stomachs evolved with a preference for grasses.
While on the one hand we could bemoan the fact that cows (and our atmosphere) have been subjected to assault from diets of corn and soy (and other things), the real lesson here is that sometimes we really don’t have to reinvent the wheel, or the diets of cows.
When mega-farms started treating cows like machines instead of animals that have an evolutionary history, they lost sight of the bigger, sustainable picture. Yes, they were able to up the output of milk but, in the long run, it was a costly undertaking and not a very elegant solution. Ramping up production and creating higher ”efficiencies” is not necessarily indicative of technological advancement or innovation.
It could be indicative of poor design – on mega-farming’s part, not the cows’.
There is a common perception that the military is all about procedures, about doing things by the book, doing things the way they’ve always been done; you simply don’t make waves.
Waves are something Navy Commander D. Michael Abrashoff lives with, thrives upon, and even fosters.
This Fast Company Articleis well worth reading in its entirety. In it Commander Abrashoff shares what he and his crew have done to make the USS Benfold a flagship of innovation.
Some key points:
“All I ever wanted to do in the navy was to command a ship. I don’t care if I ever get promoted again. And that attitude has enabled me to do the right things for my people instead of doing the right things for my career. In the process, I ended up with the best ship in the navy — and I got the best evaluation of my career. The unintended benefit? My promotion is guaranteed!” – Commander Abrashoff
When Abrashoff took command: “I pulled the string on everything we did, and I asked the people responsible for — or affected by — each department or program, ‘Is there a better way to do things?’ “
Always be concerned about morale
Retaining your people in tough times is not an option but a necessity. Commander Abrashoff has 100% retention for his career enlisted people (54% is the average)
Get answers to the following questions from each new member of your team: Why did they join the team? What’s their family situation like? What are their goals while they’re on the team – and beyond? How can I help them chart a course through life?
Ask each person to answer the following three questions: What do you like most about your workplace? What do you like least? What would you change if you could? Take their answers seriously and work to improve.
A culture of trust must be the operating norm
Treat people with respect and dignity; take care of them
People need to feel good about what they do
Use technology to help solve problems
People need to be owners of what they do
In short, when leaders empower their people on the grassroots level, the results will be nothing short of amazing.
When searching for a solution there is a tendency to try and constrain our solution by imposing rules and guidelines.
However, when dealing with people, especially people who are interacting with each other, sometimes the best rules are those which aren’t really rules at all.
In other words, the best rules are those which are simple and force people to use their brains -to think.
Granted, people often don’t want to think; we’d rather abrogate our responsibilities and kick into automaton mode. Nonetheless, we should be open to the fact that those very rules meant to make things safer and more efficient actually might be preventing a more innovative solution from surfacing.
In the video above I want you to see what happens when traffic lights are absent and all types of traffic intermingle. In particular I want you to look starting around the 00:32 mark at the person shown in this frame capture (who looks like he is about to become a statistic):
It’s amazing!
This great page on Intelligent Traffic Design by Matthew May, shows even more examples of how traffic works better without signals!
Can you think of other examples where removing constraints results in innovative solutions?
Do you think this technique would work on US streets?
Do you think this type of solution might have merit in manufacturing facilities?
While you can’t receive any type of certificate or degree, it’s worth diving into these courses to broaden your horizons. They also provide suggestions for reading materials.
To get more out of this experience, I recommend you call together some friends and pick a class. Learning together is more fun and a great way to learn. Plus, you can take your virtual class in the direction you want it go.
If you go that route, let me know - I just might join you!